Wednesday, 16 April 2025

Myanmar junta chief to meet ASEAN chair after years of being kept at a distance


Don Pathan
Mizzima News

Tomorrow’s meeting between Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim and Chairman of the State Administration Council (SAC), Senior General Min Aung Hlaing, in Bangkok will mark the first time that the chair of the ASEAN Standing Committee meets with the Myanmar junta chief after years of keeping him at a distance.

“The meeting comes at a time of uncertainty, and at the same time provides opportunities for Myanmar stakeholders to work and converge on the common objective of humanitarian support for the quake victims. Thailand and Malaysia will work closer on this and both would like to see progress on the ASEAN’s Five-Point Consensus,” said Kavi Chongkitavorn, a veteran journalist and an expert on ASEAN affairs.

Anwar insists that he is not abandoning ASEAN’s Five-Point Consensus as the basis for the regional grouping’s engagement with Myanmar, but maintains that the meeting is being held purely on humanitarian grounds. He will be looking to advance the ceasefire between rebel forces and SAC troops.

“With just one phone call, he (Min Aung Hlaing) agreed to meet in Bangkok, despite April 17 being a major religious holiday in Myanmar. This reflects both respect for Malaysia and their willingness to engage in dialogue,” Anwar said.

Instead of thanking Min Aung Hlaing, it makes more sense that the Myanmar junta chief thanks Anwar for the invitation. After all, this is something that the junta chief has been looking for and something that the resistance movements have been dead against — legitimizing the status of this junta chief who pay lip service to humanitarian issues but continue to bomb civilians, not necessary as part of a military strategy but to terrorize them into submission.

SAC’s decision to renege on the promise to halt offensives to facilitate humanitarian aid to the areas affected by the earthquake reflects the fragility of Anwar’s peace initiative.

If nothing concrete comes out of the meeting, Min Aung Hlaing can always say that he did not hesitate to engage with regional leaders to address Myanmar’s humanitarian crisis.

Indeed, one cannot overlook the political underpinnings of tomorrow’s meeting in Bangkok. It is not clear if Thaksin Shinawatra and his daughter, Prime Minister Paetongtarn, will join the meeting. Thaksin was appointed advisor to Anwar.

Malaysia may be the chairman of ASEAN. But it doesn’t mean its policy and strategy are confined to humanitarian initiatives. Thousands have lost their lives because of the earthquake and the ongoing conflicts. Access to medical support is extremely limited.

But with the current humanitarian drive following the massive earthquake, ASEAN members and Myanmar’s neighbouring countries may have just found a new way to work toward resolving the crisis inside the country. Min Aung Hlaing is using it to heighten his standing internationally. There is no reason why Thailand and other ASEAN member states cannot do the same thing — using the crisis to reach out to Myanmar’s resistance forces and EAOs to push for a more robust ceasefire and conflict resolution.

Thailand employed the same humanitarian argument when it pushed through the humanitarian coordination effort to bring aid across the border to villagers in Karen State. Ethnic Armed Organizations (EAOs) warned against it, saying the effort did more to help legitimize the SAC. They said the design was flawed as it reached only a handful of people. Such concerns still exist today.

Anwar said the ceasefire was crucial as it allows humanitarian aid to reach victims of the recent earthquake in Myanmar. Yes, that may be true. But one has to keep in mind that much of the areas along the Myanmar border are controlled by EAOs and resistance forces. The question is whether Malaysia, Thailand, and ASEAN will have the political courage to engage these forces or will they stick to the status quo for fear of offending the SAC, the fancy name that the Myanmar junta has given itself.

Anwar said assistance would only be offered if military operations were suspended. “The people are suffering… so I asked for a ceasefire. Two days later, Myanmar announced a truce in place until April 22. Although not solely due to our efforts, Malaysia has at least taken a clear stand on behalf of ASEAN. Insha-Allah, during my meeting with him on April 17, I will push for the ceasefire to be extended,” he added.

The Red Cross Society of Thailand, an outfit that coordinates its humanitarian efforts with state agencies, has consistently provided aid and medical supplies to Burmese internally displaced persons (IDPs) through civil authorities closely aligned with EAOs such as the Karen National Union (KNU) and Democratic Karen Benevolent Army (DKBA). Perhaps the government could learn from their examples.

Indeed, the fragmentation in Myanmar has forced bordering countries to adjust their stance and policy. But balancing engagement with Naypyidaw and the opponents of the regime has not been easy. There have been suggestions in Thai government circles that Thailand should become a place where discussions and debates about Myanmar can be conducted safely. But such ideas have not gained serious traction at the policy level. Again, for fear of offending the SAC, Thailand does not seem to want to be too open about their interactions with opposition forces and prefers to keep them as local, unofficial arrangements.

Meanwhile, Myanmar’s National Unity Government (NUG) and other opposition groups have issued a statement expressing their concern about the planned meeting between the Myanmar junta chief and the ASEAN chair. The statement warned about the dangers of the meeting being held under the guise of trying to help with humanitarian aid. The junta has not adhered to the Five-Point Consensus and continues to attack civilians, despite the desperate need to help quake victims.

The statement points out that players other than the military junta need to be engaged during the humanitarian aid drive. They point out the dangers of unilateral engagement with a player who is considered a “terrorist”. Such an approach undermines the core humanitarian principles of neutrality, impartiality, and independence and fails to ensure aid is delivered according to need.

“Rather than supporting the people of Myanmar, these actions risk legitimizing the illegal military coup and reinforcing the regime responsible for their suffering. Therefore, we firmly reject any such decisions,” the statement says.

Don Pathan is a Thailand-based security analyst

https://eng.mizzima.com/2025/04/16/21353 




Tuesday, 15 April 2025

Thailand: Of Uyghur Deportations and Backlash

Don Pathan
(www.stratsea.com)

Uyghur protesters in front of the Thai Embassy in Washington, DC, following the deportation of 40 detainees.

Introdduction

In late October 2024, rumours circulated in Bangkok’s diplomatic circle that Thailand would hand over the remaining 48 Uyghurs in a Thai prison and Immigration Detention Centers to China in February 2025. Despite strong objections from the international community and human rights groups, this was seen as a “gift” from Thailand to China to commemorate the 50th anniversary of diplomatic relations.

Former prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra was the brain behind this idea. As the father of the current prime minister and the nominal head of a powerful political machine dominating Thailand’s political scene for more than two decades, nobody stood in his way. Reasons as to why the previous government led by General Prayuth Chan-ocha did not deport the Uyghurs did not seem to matter.

If anything, Prayuth was in a better position to do so. Being the chief of the junta behind the 2014 coup that ousted Thaksin’s sister, Yingluck, from power, his government was at first isolated by the West, particularly the United States. The isolation pushed Thailand closer to China, leading to, among others, an important submarine deal.

What Happened to the Detainees?

The Prayut administration did not know what they were waiting for, but they played that waiting game and kept the Uyghurs in Thai detention centres. They knew that a deportation would invite the wrath of the international community, potentially isolating Thailand further.

Adding to the drama was a jailbreak (some said it was assisted by officials) at the Songkhla detention centre in November 2017, where 25 Uyghurs escaped to make their way to Malaysia. The Malaysian government later resettled them in Turkey. Beijing raised a stink, but bilateral ties normalised quickly because China needed Malaysia’s support for its Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). Besides, no Malaysian leader was about to compromise his standing in the Muslim world.

Thailand, on the other hand, was not exactly a champion of anything.

The 40 Uyghur who were sent back to China on 27 February 2024 by the Thai government were part of some 220 men, women and children who were caught on the Thailand-Malaysia border in March 2014 as they were about to cross into Malaysia (scores of others were arrested in separate occasions around the same time period).

Shortly afterwards, about 170 women and children were resettled in Turkey, but around 100 men were transferred to the Chinese authorities a week later.

Worse, the following month (17 August 2015) saw suspected Uyghur terrorists bomb the Erawan Shrine in the heart of Bangkok, killing 20 and injuring 125. The shrine is popular among Chinese visitors, who make up the majority of the dead and wounded.

The remaining 50 or so Uyghurs were charged with illegal entry and served their jail time; afterward, they remained in Thailand’s detention centres under no clear justification other than the lack of political will to take decisive action on the leaders’ part. Some had passed away due to illness, while five were serving prison time for attacking security guards as they were escaping detention.

China never let up with its demand for Thailand to deport the rest. To avoid further headaches, Thai law enforcement was told not to detain any Uyghur coming through the country. They were told to direct any incoming Uyghurs to Malaysia.

“Thailand is a very strong US partner, a strong historical ally,” Rubio said during his Senate hearing on 15 January 2025. “That is an area where I think diplomacy could really achieve results because of how important that relationship is and how close it is.” Or so he thought.

Rubio, a leading critic of Beijing, co-sponsored the 2021 Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act, which bans imports from Xinjiang unless free of forced labour. His stance on human rights in China has subjected him to Chinese sanctions since 2020.

It appeared that the Thailand government did not care about what Rubio had to say. Even if they did, it probably would not matter, as Thaksin was already set on his effort to please the Chinese.

On 14 March 2025, Rubio hit back and announced “visa restrictions on current and former officials from the Government of Thailand responsible for, or complicit in, the forced return of 40 Uyghurs from Thailand on February 27.”

One day before the US order on visa restrictions, the European Parliament condemned the deportation and “urges Thailand to halt any further forced returns to countries where people’s lives are at risk.”

The resolution also urged Thailand to reform its lèse majesté law (Article 112) and called on the European Commission to “leverage free trade agreement negotiations to press Thailand to reform the country’s lese-majesty law, release political prisoners, halt the deportation of Uyghur refugees, and to ratify all core International Labour Organization (ILO) conventions.”

China was quick to hit back but directed its comment to Washington. “On the one hand, the US engages in indiscriminate deportations of illegal immigrants, yet, on the other, it points fingers at and smears other countries’ legitimate law enforcement cooperation, imposes sanctions, and pressures others,” said China’s Foreign Ministry spokeswoman, Mao Ning, describing the United States’ actions as “typical bullying”.

While the fear among human rights activists that the remaining Uyghurs would be deported to China did not subside, it was not until January 2025 that everybody sensed something was not right; a group of Thai government officials visited the Uyghur detainees and politely asked them if they would like to return to China voluntarily. They were asked to sign the deportation paper, which they rejected outright.

Words of the meeting got out and the activists as well as opposition parties responded in full force, demanding an explanation from the government. Some of the detainees staged a hunger strike to protest what they saw as a ploy to get them to agree on the deportation.

The situation had gone quiet and the Uyghurs ended their hunger strike. Then, on 27 February 2025, it was rumoured that the Immigration Police were preparing to deport the Uyghur detainees. Reporters and activists went to the detention centre in Bangkok where they were held, but as the vehicles pulled out of the station, reporters were blocked. The rest was history.

Dumbstruck by Rubio’s harsh responses, Thailand insisted that the deportation was voluntary despite evidence to the contrary.

Raised Questions

A trip was organised for a group of journalists to tag along with Thai ministers to Xinjiang to visit the returnees. Observers said it was a sham, but the government insisted that it was not.

According to photos released by the government, the deportees were united with their relatives, but their immediate family members were sent to Turkey by Thai authorities over a decade ago.

Defense Minister Phumtham Wechayachai and Justice Minister Thawee Sodsong display photos showing that the Uyghurs returned by Thailand arrived safely in Xinjiang and were reunited with their waiting relatives on Feb. 27, 2025.

Critics and activists came out in full force, particularly the Malay Muslims in the southernmost provinces who had looked up to Justice Minister Thawee Sodsong and considered him to be one of their own, especially as one of the leaders of a political party from the region. They had hoped that he would stand up against the deportation of the Uyghur detainees.

Asmadee Bueheng, a writer from Pattani, said that for Thai and Malay activists, deportation was about human rights. However, for local Islamic leaders, it was about Muslims being mistreated.

Moreover, many Thais wrongly assumed that the government, being democratically elected, would be more sympathetic to the voices of human rights activists. They felt let down, especially those who had given the government the benefit of the doubt for changing their words on military and constitutional reforms.

Concluding Thoughts

For the time being, officials in Bangkok are putting on a brave face, playing down Washington’s sanctions on government officials. However, it was nothing less than a major embarrassment, considering the fact that the two countries are treaty allies. This is not to mention the fact that Washington was quick to point out to Bangkok the repeated offers to resettle the Uyghur.

The United States has in the past imposed sanctions on Thailand, suspending military aid after coups. This marked the first time that the sanction targeted government officials, although the United States has not identified these individuals. How this will affect the bilateral ties between these so-called longstanding allies, on the other hand, remains to be seen. However, there is no indication that the sanction will slow down Thaksin and his quest to steer Thailand in the direction that serves his personal and political ambitions.

Don Pathan is a security analyst focusing on conflict in Myanmar/Burma and insurgency in Thailand's far south.

The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of STRAT.O.SPHERE CONSULTING PTE LTD. 


Saturday, 12 April 2025

Thai PBS: ฟังเสียงประเทศไทย I โต๊ะเจรจาสันติภาพหายไปไหน ? ฟังเสียงที่ 3 ชายแดนใต้

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6PBobltJQdE

[UNCUT] ฟังเสียงประเทศไทย I โต๊ะเจรจาสันติภาพหายไปไหน ? ฟังเสียงที่ 3 ชายแดนใต้

...ก้าวเข้าสู่ปีที่ 21 ของสถานการณ์ความไม่สงบในพื้นที่ชายแดนใต้ มีผู้เสียชีวิตไปแล้ว กว่า 7,600 คน งบประมาณที่ภาครัฐทุ่มลงไปสำหรับการดับไฟใต้ตลอดช่วง 20 ปีที่ผ่านมากว่า 5 แสนล้านบาท ถูกตั้งคำถามว่า ประสบความสำเร็จแค่ไหน ?



...ก้าวเข้าสู่ปี






าท ถูกตั้งคำถามว่า ประสบความสำเร็จแค่ไหน ?


Monday, 31 March 2025

Mulling Thailand’s approach to the Myanmar junta’s election

Don Pathan
Myanmar News

An unwanted spotlight will be placed on Thailand when the government explains its stance as to why the country should or should not support the upcoming General Election in Myanmar planned for later this year or early next, knowing that it will be a sham as the Myanmar junta no longer controls the majority of the country.

Credit: Mizzima News
To do so would not only help whitewash the much-condemned State Administrative Council (SAC), the name the Myanmar junta had given itself for the 2021 coup. Endorsing the election could also isolate Thailand even further from the rest of the international community whose progressive values and commitments on humanitarian principles every Thai government professed to embrace but always lacked the political will to do so. The deportation of Burmese migrant workers back to Myanmar, where the junta forcibly conscripts them, is a case in point.

When it comes to trouble-plagued Myanmar, also known as Burma, the international community tends to look to Thailand as an entry point. The number of self-proclaimed personal connections over the past decades by Thai generals, prime ministers, and foreign ministers that often translated to lucrative business deals gives members of the international community the idea that Thailand could use its charm to convince the Tatmadaw or Myanmar military to improve its act. 

In late 1988, for example, then army chief Gen. Chavalit Yongchaiyudh led a delegation to Rangoon to break
international isolation. Senior Gen. Saw Maung, the then leader of Burma, called the Thai general a “true friend” of Myanmar. To show their gratitude, lucrative logging contracts, fishing rights, and deals in the hotel business were awarded to Thai companies. 

Myanmar activists today still recalled vividly the August-September 1988 brutal suppression of student-led pro-democracy protestors, known as the “8888 Uprising,” that resulted in the death of more than three thousand people. 

Besides isolating itself from the international community, relations between Thailand and Myanmar ethnic armed organizations (EAO) fighting the SAC could also take a downturn, as could the long-standing practice of using them as a buffer between the Thai Army and the Myanmar troops. 

For a very long time, any EAOs fighting the Myanmar government were always deemed a friend of Thailand, while those with a ceasefire pact with the Tatmadaw are a threat to Thai national security. Engaging and strengthening ties with the EAOs along Thailand’s northern border was one school of thought for Thai defense planners. The second school calls for direct engagement with the Myanmar military government, but critics often equate this approach as economic opportunism. 

Economic cooperation was what Thaksin Shinawatra had in mind when he came to power in February 2001, a time when there were cross-border shellings in response to Myanmar’s intrusion, as well as the detention of Thai Paramilitary Rangers on the Pang Noon hill in Chiang Rai. The two leading military figures at the time were Army chief Gen. Surayud Chulanont and commander of the Third Army Area, Lt. General Wattanachai Chaimuanwong; these two weren’t going to let the Tatmadaw push them around. They would be sidelined by Thaksin for obvious reasons.

Besides the relentless production of methamphetamines by a pro-Rangoon outfit, the United Wa State Army (UWSA), that find its way onto the streets of Thailand and other parts of Southeast Asian cities, the Thai Army was also frustrated with the Wa’s mass relocation of over 100,000 people from its traditional stronghold along the Sino-Burma border and resettled them in newly built towns and villages adjacent to Thailand’s Chiang Mai and Chiang Rai. 

Eventually, the bickerings between the two sides gave way to an all-out assault by the Thai troops. On May 20, 2002, Thai infantry units and armoured personnel carriers (APC) supported by light and heavy artillery launched an all-out offensive to take out positions manned by the UWSA.

Shan State Army – South provided some guidance on the ground and, naturally, pointed to the positions where the Tatmadaw officers were posted. Thai soldiers had been seen taking up positions along the northern border in Chiang Mai, Chiang Rai, and Mae Hong Son provinces for weeks, awaiting instruction. It was supposed to be a military training exercise, Surasri 143. But in reality, it became one of the biggest military operations since the Vietnam War. The incoming government was in over its head, but Thaksin was determined to patch things up with Burma. 

For a man with quirky ambitions, Thaksin would soon contradict himself. One of the first orders of business was countering narcotics. As his controversial drug war claimed 3,000 lives in three months, his government conveniently pointed to the UWSA as the source of the problem. Nothing was hardly said about the social-economic situation of the users. 

The problem with his approach was that the Wa has powerful allies, namely the Myanmar government. As a result, Thaksin was outsmarted by the then-powerful intelligence chief, Gen. Khin Nyunt, who succeeded in getting Thaksin to endorse the Yongkha Development Project in a UWSA-controlled area, thinking this will help the Wa kick the opium habit. While no one in the international community put any money in it, Khin Nyunt succeeded in achieving his goal, which was to whitewash the UWSA, an outfit that has been dubbed the world’s largest armed drug trafficking army by the US State Department. 

Relations with Burma improved steadily with Thakin in power while democracy and human rights took a backseat. The bilateral ties were interrupted when Thaksin was ousted in September 2006. Coup leader and then army chief Gen. Sonthi Boonyaratglin appointed Gen. Surayudh, hero to Burmese exile and ethnic armies because of his tough stance against the Tatmadaw, as Thailand’s prime minister. But Surayud was committed to a timeline to return the mandate to the Thai people and the junta government that he led was around for only 16 months. 

Like Thaksin, the incoming Prime Minister Samak Sundaravej, an ultranationalist with a checkered past in Thai politics, was more interested in stability, not confrontation with Myanmar. During his first visit to Myanmar, Samak did relay the message from the US and British governments, as well as the UN head, about the need to allow international aid groups entry to the country devastated by a cyclone, which had left 34,273 persons dead, 1,403 injured and 27,836 missing according to figure released by Myanmar state media.

The following government of Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva, who came to power after a shifting alliance in the Parliament that made him the majority, said his “flexible engagement” policy for Burma called for more open dialogue on issues such as human rights.

“ASEAN to be strong it has to have the credibility and respect from the international community,” he said. “So what’s happening in Myanmar clearly affects the rest of the region – and I would just point out that it’s time for change. As far as we are concerned, we need to get ASEAN to become more proactive – it’s not easy but I’ve seen changes and I’ve seen progress.”

The July 2011 general election saw Thaksin’s sister, Yingluck, becoming the prime minister. During his visit to the country, Snr. General Min Aung Hlaing, the commander-in-chief, said relations between Thailand and Myanmar are at their most cordial in the history of ties between the two countries. 

Yingluck continued with the promotion of the Dawei Special Economic Zone project in southern Myanmar, seeing it as a legacy of her fugitive brother Thaksin. Located on the Andaman coast, the project aims to be Southeast Asia’s largest industrial zone. 

Yingluck was ousted in a coup in May 2014 by a Thai junta that would stay in power for the next nine years. A firm bond between the two sides was reassured under the leadership of Prime Minister Gen. Prayuth Chan-ocha, the junta chief. Min Aung Hlaing visited Thailand two months after the coup, becoming the first foreigner of significant rank to visit the country. It was nothing less than a display of brotherhood. 

State Councilor Aung San Suu Kyi paid a visit to Thailand in June 2016, during which she signed three MOUs with Prayuth that touched on employment protection and improving working conditions for the millions of Myanmar migrant workers in the country. As expected, the two leaders referred to the Dawai project on how bilateral economic cooperation could be enhanced. 

Suu Kyi was ousted in a coup in February 2021. As expected, Prayuth stepped up to Myanmar’s rescue even at the expense of upsetting fellow ASEAN members who had shunned the Tatmadaw for the coup by barring high-level meetings with the junta or SAC, ASEAN drew up a five-point concensus that includes dialogue, humanitarian aid, and an end to violence. Myanmar’s generals ignored the bloc’s initiative. 

As foreign governments condemned the coup and the military’s brutal crackdown on peaceful protesters, Thailand attended the Armed Forces Day in Naypyidaw, a month after the coup.  

Thailand’s Deputy Prime Minister Don Pramudwinai sponsored a meeting on Myanmar in June in Pattaya, giving veteran diplomat Than Swe a platform to repeat the Burmese junta’s justifications for the 2021 coup. Foreign Ministers from key ASEAN countries – Singapore, Indonesia, and Malaysia – shunned the Pattaya meeting, insisting that the five-point consensus must be the only guiding principle. 

FM Don insisted that Thailand has much at stake because of its geographical proximity, thus the need to take a more direct, i.e., bilateral approach to helping get Myanmar back on track. 

The next Thai government, under the leadership of Prime Minister Srettha Tavisin, a real estate tycoon handpicked by Thaksin, didn’t have time for Myanmar, much less national security, including insurgency in the Muslim-majority southernmost border provinces. The utmost importance for the government was economic recovery to win back the constituency that they lost after the Faustian deal with Thaksin and junta leaders that ousted his sister from power in 2014. 

But slowly, Foreign Minister Parnpree Bahiddha-nukara and Vice Ministre Sihasak Puangketkaeo patched things up with ASEAN members on Myanmar policy and pushed through the so-called humanitarian corridor. The transfer of humanitarian supplies crossed from Mae Sot to Myawaddy. Not long after that humanitarian initiative that was supposed to expand to areas affected by the battles inside Myanmar, Pranpree resigned from his post, following disagreement with party leadership. Sihasak followed him. 

Pranpree was replaced by a career diplomat, FM Maris Sangiampongsa, a long-standing supporter of Thaksin who stuck with this telecommunication tycoon through thick and thin since his ouster by a coup in 2006. But Thailand needed more than another “yes man” in the Cabinet as the situation inside neighbouring Myanmar was getting too dire. More than ever before, there was a sense that the revolutionary forces could defeat the Myanmar military government. 

And when it was time for Maris to do something, it was a platform for the SAC to pitch the upcoming general election. Speaking in Bangkok to a group of neighbouring countries in December 2024, Myanmar FM Than Swe said SAC would permit international observers for the upcoming election. He said nothing about how polling would be carried out in states such as Chin, Kachin, Karen, Karenni, and Rakhine, where EAOs and PDF are very much in control on the ground. 

In line with his ambition to be recognized as a regional statesman, Thaksin stepped in, thinking that he had the clout to pull this off. He travelled up to Chiang Mai with a prepared document appointing him the peace maker for the Myanmar conflict. But no one from the Burmese ethnic armed organizations would sign it. He doesn’t seem to understand that he is not exactly an honest broker, given his close connection with the Myanmar military. 

Fierce fighting inside Myanmar dimmed so many things, including hope to revive the Dawei SEZ mega project. A recent commitment from Russia on the development of this project may give a new lease on life for this dying project. But if the opposition People’s Defence Forces (PDF) continue to gain ground in this region, the horse is likely to remain dead. 

For the time being, Myanmar is under the control of the EAOs and the PDFs, the armed wing of the exile government – the National Unity Government (NUG) of Myanmar. 

A massive earthquake hit Myanmar on March 28, but that didn’t stop the Tatmadaw from carrying out air strikes, something the military had been doing since the coup. Security experts such as Prof. Zachary Abuza of the US National War College said the air war is used to terrorize the Myanmar people and does not serve any strategic purpose.

It is not clear if the upcoming general election will be pushed back because of the earthquake. Nevertheless, it is clear that the junta is looking towards the election as a seal of approval, a new beginning for them and for key allies, such as China and possibly Thailand. 

Min Aung Hlaing will be coming to Bangkok to attend the BIMSTEC, a mostly South Asian region grouping, summit meeting from April 3-4. The SAC will try to make the best out of it, but whether this means anything in the long term, on the other hand, remains to be seen. 

Don Pathan is a Thailand-based security analyst.


Friday, 28 March 2025

Can the massive scam industry on China's doorstep be stopped?

 Caught between Myanmar's militias and Beijing's demands, thousands face an uncertain fate

Avatar
Don Pathan
March 28, 2025 05:05 JST

20250326 myanmar karen army

A soldier of the Karen National Liberation Army (KNLA) burns Myanmar's national flag at a military base at Thingyan Nyi Naung village on the outskirts of Myawaddy, the Thailand-Myanmar border town under the control of a coalition of rebel forces led by the Karen National Union, in  April 2024. © Reuters

Don Pathan is a Thailand-based security analyst.

Until recently, twice a day, two plane loads of Chinese tourists on commercial flights from Bangkok would land here at Mae Sot, a border town in Thailand not known for much other than cross-border trade with Myanmar.

https://asia.nikkei.com/Opinion/Can-the-massive-scam-industry-on-China-s-doorstep-be-stopped

Friday, 21 March 2025

Tensions Rise in Southern Thailand as Ramadhan Ceasefire Talks Stall

Don Pathan
www.stratsea.com

The Thai Government was hoping to secure a ceasefire with the Patani Malay separatist rebels for this year’s Ramadhan. However, after over two weeks since the start of the holy month, the two sides still have yet to find middle ground.
A Defence Volunteer miraculously survived an explosion from a bomb hidden under her vehicle in Pattani.

Worse, violence has not only spiked – the recent attacks have been extremely daring. As seen on 8 March 2025, a group of about 10 combatants raided the compound of the Sungai Kolok District Office in Narathiwat just before midnight, killing two and wounding seven security officials in a brief but fierce gunfight.

The combatant arrived in two vehicles, one of which was packed with explosives, parked near the district office building. It was set off shortly after they retreated from the vicinity. 

The same evening, in Sai Buri District of Pattani, a smaller explosive lured Paramilitary Rangers to the scene, where they were hit with a much more powerful bomb. Insurgents commence fire immediately upon explosion, killing three Rangers at the scene. This was not an isolated incident. 

Warning to all Defence Volunteers: Stop serving Siam.
Earlier in the week, suspected insurgents threw pipe bombs at security officials near the train station in Yala, wounding four bystanders. And on Monday morning (March 17), a security officer from the Ministry of Interior barely survived a blast from a bomb that was hidden underneath her personal vehicle that went off as she was driving to work. Words have been out for some months now about rebel forces urging MOI’s security officials, locally known as Defense Volunteers, to quit their job and to refrain from acting as spies or agent for the Thai security apparatus.

Aftermath of a bomb blast on the personal vehicle belonging to a Thai security officer.
These incidents, caught on CCTV from various angles, reinforced the understanding that insurgency is a form of communicative action in which a non-state actor uses violence to send political messages to the state security apparatus.

Indeed, the Barisan Revolusi Nasional (BRN) has not been pleased with the Thai government’s foot dragging with the peace negotiation. In December 2024, Nikmatullah Bin Seri, the head of BRN technical team, issued a public statement saying the group was prepared to walk away from the process and take back their commitment to negotiate under the Thai Constitution if Bangkok is not serious about the talk. The peace process was supposed to resume once a new government came to power after the 2023 general election.


The following month, Thai Defense Minister Phumtham Wechayachai called on all relevant agencies to draft an “actionable solution” to resolve the conflict. Days later, Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra made her first visit to the far South. Incidentally, she visited the Thamvithya Mulnithi school, where several BRN political figures and the chief negotiator, as well as the late spiritual leader of the movement and the Patani region, Sapae-ing Basor, had worked as teachers and principal before fleeing Thailand to avoid arrest.
Phumtham’s directive and the PM visit may suggest that the government was giving in to BRN’s demands. But in fact, Bangkok was setting rigid terms for future talks. According to a government source, Phumtham has demanded that BRN curb their violence before he would appoint a negotiating team.  He is also considering doing away with foreign mediation, which would mean an end to all back-channeling, and axed the position of the five international conflict experts who function as observers for the high-level talks. Malaysia, the designated facilitator, will be the sole mediator for the talks, according to one Thai official who spoke on condition of anonymity.

It is not clear if Phumtham will scrap the Joint Comprehensive Plan Toward Peace (JCPP), the so-called road map for peace. Thailand and BRN, with the help of foreign NGOs and Malaysia working in separate and often competing tracks, spent the past three years going back and forth on the JCPP. They identified three items to be on the negotiating table: reduction of violence, public consultation, and a political solution to the conflict. Specific details are to be negotiated in the following phase.

BRN leaked the draft of the JCPP to the public early last year to test the water; the result was a big stir among government security officials and the military, who never liked the idea of talking to the rebels in the first place. They still think military option is the best way forward.

Because of the outpour of criticisms from the public and top government advisors, the Thai negotiating team was badly isolated; they were accused of giving in too much to the BRN. What Phumtham does not understand is that for the BRN, the peace process is the beginning of a very long journey that will not rest until the movement achieve either independence or a form of “self-government”. Under the latter arrangement, sovereign remained with Bangkok but regional Parliament makes the law for this historically contested region. According to a report released by The Patani on the peace process, BRN maintained that even under a “self-government”, the people of Patani must retain the right to succession. 

These are tall order, indeed, considering that after two decades of off-and-on peace initiatives, Thailand has never permitted the talks to move beyond confidence-building measures. Even with direct engagement with BRN, the one group that control virtually all the combatants on the ground, Phumtham continue to sound like a broken record – suggesting that the government is still doubtful of working directly with BRN or if BRN is truly the party that the government should work with. While this suggests a need for the government to verify that it is talking with the right people, such verification may not amount to anything in light of the government’s high level of distrust to BRN.

Stalled Negotiation

In line with past practices, the Thai side – remnants of the now-defunct Peace Dialogue Panel, the official negotiators – tried to push for a ceasefire during this year’s Ramadhan, which started on 1 March 2025.

Malaysia’s facilitator for the peace process, Mohd Rabin Basir, tried hard to help the Thais push this request through but was not able to do so. This was because BRN refused to budge on their demand that the ceasefire include a monitoring mechanism by international peace and conflict experts and that local civil society organizations be given a role in observing the process as well. Other demands include the release of BRN prisoners and the appointment of a negotiating team for the peace talks.

Observers of the peace process said they are not surprised why BRN refused to give in to the Thai government’s call for separate unilateral ceasefire during the month of Ramdan. First, said Artef Sohko, president of The Patani, a political action group dedicated to the right to self-determination for the southern people, Thailand has always tried to use the reduction of violence for short-term political gains.

“BRN can see through Thailand on this and that’s why they are not going along with it this time around,” Artef said.

BRN still recalled how the Thai Army belittled their unilateral ceasefire during the Covid-19 pandemic following a call for a global ceasefire from the UN Secretary General António Guterres. It was an opportunity missed as the Thai side could have reciprocated BRN’s gesture of goodwill and build on it. Instead, the Thai Army in the far south unleashed search and destroy operations, taking down combatants who were laying low in and around the home village in a series of lob-sided standoffs.

What was astonishing in the mind of the many security officials was the fact that, despite being outnumbered by 60-70 to one, all but one of the combatants chose death, or rather, fight to death, instead of surrendering, even though their chances of making it out alive were slim to none. A total of 60 BRN combatants were killed in the standoffs during this window.

Despite the grave disappointment because the Thai Army’s refusal to stand down, BRN did give Thailand the benefit of the doubt. The agreement for Ramadhan 2022 was pretty straightforward – the Thai military vowed not to go after cell members, while BRN agreed not to carry out attacks during the Muslim holy month and through Visakha Bucha Day, a Buddhist holiday observed this year on 15 May. A bigger leap of faith was the move to declare all mosques in this region a sanctuary where combatants could meet their family members during the last 10 days of Ramadan, which ended on May 1.

It is Not (Just) Religion

Local activists who observed the conflict warned against bringing religion into the equation could complicate things because the root causes of this conflict are political in nature as it has to do with the Malays’ rejection of Thai policy of assimilation that comes at the expense of their ethno-religious identity. For Muslims in this historically contested region, it is already a big turn-off when this predominantly Buddhist state tries to use Ramadan for its political gain.

Every now and then, Islamic religious leaders have been called upon to issue fatwa, or religious edict, to condemn the rebels on religious grounds. Needless to say, this effort made Muslim clerics in this region extremely uncomfortable as it would pit them against the separatist combattants. Moreover, separatist insurgency between the Thai state and the Malays of Patani does not have the support of the Thai Muslims who live outside the Malay-speaking South.

It has always been the Patani Malay cultural-historical narrative, not religion, that keep on producing generation after generation of fighters. While the banner of the struggle is rooted in Malay nationalism, words and actions are often expressed in religious terms. All Patani Malay fighters are buried as shahid, or martyr, for example. For the Malays of Patani, identity and religion are two sides of the same coin. Thus, when Thailand pushed through its policy of assimilation that required the Malays to deny their own identity and embrace the Thai one, they rejected it violently.

Today, the battle over the narrative between the Malay activists and the Army has reached the court. Patani Malay activists feel that they should be able to talk about referendum in a public forum, while the Army insisted that such discussion is not negotiable. Sadly, said Artef, the Army appeared to have the support of the so-called pro-democracy movements in Thailand when it comes to Thai nationalism.

While many may support the idea of a separate Malay Muslim state, no one would openly say it publicly as it would invite nasty retaliation from the Thai government. So far, more than 40 youth activists have been charged by the police, at the request of the Army, with instigating a separatist state because they had used words like “Bangsa Patani”, “referendum” and “shahid” in relation to the conflict resolution and the combatants killed in a gunfight against the Thai security forces. In the local context, Bangsa can be translated as community, nation or even narrative.

History Stings Still

While Ramadan carries a religious significance for Muslims worldwide, the Malays of Patani are reminded of the Tak Bai massacre – an incident in October 2004 – in which 78 young Malay Muslims were smoldered to death on the back of Thai military trucks; seven others were shot dead at the protest site.

However, just a month before the 20-year statute of limitation expired, a Narathiwat court decided to try to cases on murder charges against 14 men linked to the death of the unarmed demonstrators. Officials were not able to bring any of the accused to the court and the case was permitted to expire. For some, it was their last attempt for justice. For others, it was an opportunity for some kind of closure with the hope that the country could move on as a nation. Obviously, that did not happen.

https://stratsea.com/tensions-rise-in-southern-thailand-as-ramadhan-ceasefire-talks-stall/ 

Author

  • Don Pathan is a security analyst focusing on conflict in Myanmar/Burma and insurgency in Thailand's far south.

Friday, 14 March 2025

Efforts to bring about Ramadan ceasefire fall apart in Thai Deep South

 A new spate of violence began days after a Malaysian peace broker relayed counter-demands from BRN rebels to the Thai side, analyst Don Pathan writes.

A soldier walks a sniffer dog along train tracks following a deadly explosion in Songkhla province, southern Thailand, Dec. 6, 2022.

Commentary by Don Pathan
BenarNews
Bangkok

When it comes to the conflict in Thailand’s far South, there may be no peace talks in sight but there’s been plenty of action.

A spike in violence in the border region in recent days was a jolting reminder that the Thai government’s uncompromising position on the peace talks with Barisan Revolusi Nasional (BRN) rebels comes with a cost. 

Starting on the night of March 8, Separatist combatants launched a spate of attacks that left six people dead through March 10. 

The violence occurred just days after Malaysian Facilitator Mohd Rabin Basir forwarded BRN counter-demands for a Ramadan ceasefire to the Thai side. Some of the demands included the release of BRN prisoners, reducing the number of days for a truce to 15, appointing a team of international experts to monitor the truce, and permitting local NGOs to have a role in working on this initiative. 

Deputy Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai rejected all of them, insisting that BRN should display their goodwill gesture by standing down during Ramadan. 

The shuttle diplomacy to get the two sides to embrace a ceasefire started in mid-February when the National Security Council chief Chatchai Bangchuad met with BRN chief negotiator Anas Abdulrahman in Malaysia to discuss an NSC proposal that included a Ramadan-time ceasefire.

Anas Abdulrahman (center), the head of the panel representing Barisan Revolusi Nasional rebels in peace talks with Thailand, and fellow BRN delegates take part in a post-meetings news conference at a hotel in Petaling Jaya, near Kuala Lumpur, Aug. 3, 2022. (S. Mahfuz/BenarNews) 

Chatchai was appointed the chief negotiator for the peace talks by the government of Prime Minister Srettha Thavisin. But his position was automatically terminated after the Constitutional Court removed Srettha and his government from power. 

On Feb. 28, NSC issued a public statement saying their agency and the regional Internal Security Operation Command would do their utmost to create an atmosphere conducive for peace during this Ramadan. 

“The government will adjust its work missions to focus on peaceful operations and facilitations as the main principle so that the people can fully practice their religious activities in the area,” the NSC said in the statement. 

According to a BRN source, who spoke on condition of anonymity, Thailand equates the Feb. 28 statement as their proclamation of a unilateral ceasefire for this year’s Ramadan. The source suggested that it was in BRN’s best interest to do the same. 

But this shuttle diplomacy didn’t start with the mid-February meeting in Kuala between Chatchai and Anas but through a December 2024 public statement by Nikmatullah Bin Seri, a senior member of the BRN’s negotiating team who criticized the Thai government for dragging its feet on the peace talks. Nikmatullah said BRN was prepared to walk away from the peace process and take back the group’s decision to negotiate with Bangkok under the Thai constitution.

The BRN official said conflict resolution, including Ramadan ceasefire, needed to be discussed with a new government chief negotiator, which the Thai government has yet to appoint.

However, Phumtham told reporters on March 12 that the new chief negotiator for the peace talks with BRN would not be appointed until a comprehensive strategic plan for the restive southern provinces was finalized.

According to a Thai official working on conflict resolution for the far South, the government will not appoint a new negotiating team until BRN curbs the violence. BRN said that demanding them to put down their weapons before coming to the negotiation table was like putting the cart before the horse. Reduction of violence is something that has to be negotiated, preferably with a government-appointed negotiator, BRN said, according to the Thai official.

Phumtham also plans to stop international peace and conflict experts from other countries from continuing to observe the high-level negotiations between Thailand and BRN, the Thai source said. Moreover, back channels will be eliminated, thus ending the role of international NGOs. 

Observers of the peace process said they were not surprised about why BRN refused to give in to the suggestions made to them by Thailand on Feb. 18. 

First of all, said Artef Sohko, president of The Patani, a political action group dedicated to the right to self-determination for the people of this historically contested region, Thailand has always tried to use a Ramadan ceasefire for short-term political gains. BRN feels that Thailand is using the peace talks as an intelligence-gathering exercise so they can go after these BRN leaders at a later date, Artef told me.

commentary deep south 3.jpeg

An official and a member of an explosives disposal team inspect a crater left by a bomb planted under rail tracks that killed at least three railway workers in Songkhla province, southern Thailand, Dec. 6, 2022. (BenarNews)

BRN said they still recalled how the Thai Army belittled their unilateral ceasefire during the COVID-19 pandemic in response to a call for a global ceasefire from U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres. It was an opportunity missed; the Thai side could have reciprocated BRN’s gesture of goodwill and built on that, Artef said. 

Instead, the Thai Army in the far South unleashed search-and-destroy operations, taking down combatants in a series of lopsided standoffs as they were laying low in the home village during the unilateral ceasefire. 

What was astonishing in the view of the many security officials was that, despite being outnumbered by 60 to 70 to one, all but one of the combatants chose to fight to the death rather than surrender, even though their chances of making it out alive were slim to none. A total of 60 BRN combatants were killed in the standoffs during that 2-year window, which covered early 2020 to early 2022.

But not much came out of this brief episode during Ramadan 2022. Since then, BRN has refused to entertain Thailand’s proposals for a Ramadan ceasefire because they see it as purely for Thai public consumption.  

While Ramadan carries a religious significance for Muslims worldwide, the Malays of Patani are reminded of the Tak Bai massacre, an incident during Ramadan in October 2004, when 78 young Malay Muslims died in the back of Thai military trucks, where they were bound and stacked up like logs after being rounded up during a protest. Another seven were shot dead by Thai security forces at the protest site in Tak Bai district, Narathiwat province. 

Just months before the 20-year statute of limitation expired, a Narathiwat court charged a group of Thai military officials for the death of unarmed demonstrators. But law enforcement officials were not able to bring any of the suspects to court and the statute of limitation for the case was permitted to expire. 

More than two weeks have passed since the start of Ramadan 2025. A truce is still nowhere in sight as the rebels crank up their campaign of violence to get the Thais back to the negotiating table. 

Don Pathan is a Thailand-based security analyst. The views expressed in this column are his own and do not reflect the position of BenarNews.

https://www.benarnews.org/english/commentaries/deep-south-peace-pathan-03142025144022.html